North Yorkshire County Council
Business and Environmental Services
Executive Members
21 May 2021
Highways Capital Programme 2021-22
Report of the Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation
1.0 Purpose of Report
1.1 To seek agreement from the Corporate Director - Business and Environmental Services (BES), in consultation with BES Executive Members, for additions to the Highways Capital Works Programme for Structural Highway Maintenance for 2021/22 identified since the last Highways Capital Programme report dated 21 August 2020
1.2 To update Corporate Director – BES and BES Executive Members on schemes that have been moved from the 2020/21 Highways Capital programme in to the 2021/22 programme.
|
2.0 Background
2.1 The Highways Capital Programme is made up of four specific elements; these are Street Lighting; Bridges and Structures; Integrated Transport and Structural Highway Maintenance. Each of these elements is subject to prioritisation methods based upon an assessment of the required outcomes.
2.2 BES Executive Members will be aware that usual practice is to present two main reports per year; one in the summer, when the following years schemes are reported; followed by a winter report, when necessary changes to the programme are reported along with the headline allocations for the programme for the year after.
2.3 In line with 2.2 above, the report was considered at the BES Executive Members meeting held on 21 August 2020.
2.4 Although advanced planning is maximised through the implementation of a three-year rolling capital works programme, there are occasions when it is necessary, for sound operational reasons, to introduce new schemes into the in-year programme.
2.5 In a similar way it is sometimes not possible to deliver programmed schemes in the financial year initially intended, these schemes are then re-programmed into later years when implementation of works can take place.
3.0 New Schemes to be introduced in the 2021/22 Capital Works Programme
3.1 The following schemes are proposed to be added to the 2021/22 programme, in advance of the next scheduled Highways Capital Programme report:
· Ridge Lane Landslip
· Borrowby Lane Landslip
· Beckhole Landslip
3.2 Further details can be found in Appendix 1.
4.0 Schemes to be carried forward into later years
4.1 During Q4 an additional 64 schemes were moved from 2020/21 to 2021/22. This means that in total 150 schemes to the value of £13.8M have been moved into 2021/22 from initial delivery in 2020/21. Funding for these schemes will be from the £5.3M of 2020/21 LTP funding carried into 2021/22 alongside the 2021/22 Highways capital budget.
4.2 Details of the recent schemes to be moved can be found in Appendix 2.
4.3 Of the 150 schemes carried into 2021/22, 51 of these are schemes that had started on site in 2020/21 and are due to finish in 2021/22. This accounts for £5,366K of the total carry over value.
5.0 Financial Implications
5.1 Any additional costs associated with implementation of the scheme/s named in Appendix 1 will be accounted for as part of the routine strategic management of the Highways Capital Works Programme.
5.2 As stated above £5.3M of 2020/21 LTP funding was carried forward at financial year end into 2021/22. This funding will deliver some of the schemes carried over from 2021/22 with the rest of these schemes to be funded from 2021/22 LTP funding.
5.3 The contents of this report make no changes to the BES Capital Plan expenditure limits.
6.0 Equalities Implications
6.1 An Equality Impact Assessment screening form was included as part of the Capital Programme overall and this found that an Equality Impact Assessment was not required. As these schemes are typical maintenance schemes it is deemed that the original screening form included schemes of this type and that there will be no Equality Implications arising from this recommendation. See Appendix 3.
7.0 Legal Implications
7.1 The County Council, as Local Highway Authority, Street Authority and Traffic Authority has a wide range of statutory duties imposed by a variety of legislation.
7.2 Although the decision to carry out these schemes has been made in-year, it was developed and prioritised in line with the relevant legislation and approved Council policies.
7.3 It is the view of officers that there are no legal implications in terms of adding these schemes to the capital programme.
8.0 Climate Change Impact
8.1 A climate change impact assessment has been carried out, see Appendix 4. The negative impact of the schemes added to the capital programme is minimal. Steps will be taken during construction to reduce constriction emissions as far as possible.
9.0 Recommendation
9.1 It is recommended that the Corporate Director - BES and the BES Executive Members i. Agree the additional schemes for delivery in the 2021/22 financial year. ii. Note the schemes that have been moved in to 2021/22 for delivery.
|
BARRIE MASON
Assistant Director - Highways and Transportation
Author of Report: Kirstine Rudd
Background Documents: Photographs to be presented at meeting
Schemes to be added to the Capital Programme
District |
|
Location |
Address |
Est Cost/£ |
Reason for addition |
Scarborough |
|
Ridge Lane |
U2269 |
£103,500 |
Landslip caused by recent bad weather has resulted in significant damage to the carriageway. The road is currently closed |
Scarborough |
|
Borrowby Lane |
U2275 |
£34,000 |
Landslip caused by recent bad weather has resulted in significant damage to the carriageway. The road is currently closed |
Scarborough |
|
Beckhole |
Beck Hole Road, Goathland |
£75,000 |
Following the cold weather at the beginning of this year there has been slippage of the road surface. The proposal is to install further drainage to the site and then reinstate the carriageway that has slipped. |
Schemes Slipped from Quarter 4 2020/21 in to future years.
District |
Scheme Description |
Original Programme Year |
Reason |
Amount to Carry over |
Part delivered over year end |
Selby |
Area 7 Junction 34 R&R |
20/21 |
Scheme carried over waiting for authority from Highways England |
139,000 |
|
Selby |
Accessibility Various locations, Thorpe Willoughby |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
10,526 |
yes |
Scarborough |
Area 3 Cat 3,4,5, Parkfield Footway |
18/19 |
Staffing Issues |
15,000 |
|
Scarborough |
Bagdale Railings |
20/21 |
Staffing Issues |
27,925 |
yes |
Scarborough |
Area 3 Killerby Bends |
19/20 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
4,000 |
|
Scarborough |
Area 3 East Ayton Landslips |
19/20 |
Design issues |
130,000 |
|
Scarborough |
Area 3 Cat 4b Carriageway Patching Oak Road |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
76,431 |
|
Scarborough |
Area 3 Cat 4b Carriageway Patching Highfield |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
120,000 |
|
Scarborough |
Area 3 Scalby Drainage |
20/21 |
Coordination with District Council |
39,520 |
|
Scarborough |
Area 3 Seamer Drainage , Rattan Row |
20/21 |
Issues with Farming Crop and then poor weather in Q4 |
12,378 |
yes |
Scarborough |
Area 3 Staithes Landslip |
20/21 |
WSP redesign still to be agreed |
18,568 |
yes |
Scarborough |
Fryup Dale Bridge |
20/21 |
Requires good weather |
10,250 |
|
Scarborough |
B1261 Crossgates Roundabout Drainage |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
5,966 |
|
Scarborough |
Westside Road, Darncombe Flooding |
20/21 |
Requires good weather |
12,000 |
|
Scarborough |
The Delves |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
30,000 |
|
Scarborough |
Broxa, Hackness |
20/21 |
Tender over year end |
206,484 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Rosedale Church House Landslips |
19/20 |
Weather and farm access |
1,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Thornton le Clay R&R |
19/20 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
24,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Cat 1,1a,2 Footway Patching |
20/21 |
Malton tender coordination |
9,620 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Cat 3b Carriageway Patching |
20/21 |
River flood causes issues with completing scheme |
10,000 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Aislaby R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
104,000 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Cropton |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
12,500 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Hawnby R&R |
20/21 |
Tender over year end |
6,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Old Byland R&R |
20/21 |
Tender over year end |
7,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Rosedale R&R |
20/21 |
Tender over year end |
5,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Hutton le Hole R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
38,268 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Kirby Grindalthye R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
38,279 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Kirkham Lane R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
64,000 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Langley Drvie Drainage |
20/21 |
Works to be completed in better weather |
2,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Lastingham R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
83,861 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Malton Footway R&R |
20/21 |
Coordination with term time |
38,874 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Malton R&R |
20/21 |
Network Rail Coordination |
49,787 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Pickering R&R |
20/21 |
Network Rail Coordination |
10,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Wombleton R&R |
20/21 |
Network Rail Coordination |
9,000 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Nunnington R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
99,180 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 Terrington R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
85,170 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Whitwell R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
74,773 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Wilton R&R |
20/21 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
65,504 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 York Road Levisham Drainage |
20/21 |
Common land issue still to be resolved |
7,912 |
|
Ryedale |
Area 4 CAULKLEYS R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
50,898 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Balksyde |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
15,552 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 Ampleforth R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
78,076 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 GILLING EAST R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
95,676 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 MARTON R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
141,185 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 NUNNINGTON R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
73,155 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 SPROXTON R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
294,473 |
yes |
Ryedale |
Area 4 WEST FIELDS KMS R&R |
21/22 |
Tender package delivered over year end |
31,190 |
yes |
Richmondshire |
Streetlighting |
20/21 |
Service connections not done on time |
200,000 |
yes |
Richmondshire |
Area 1 Worton Layby R&R |
20/21 |
Contractor delays after awarding tender |
- |
|
Richmondshire |
Area 1 Worton R&R |
20/21 |
Contractor delays after awarding tender |
308,600 |
|
Richmondshire |
Area 1 Worton Village R&R |
20/21 |
Contractor delays after awarding tender |
- |
|
Richmondshire |
Area 1 Swaledale Emergency Landslips |
20/21 |
Further work requiring better weather |
27,272 |
yes |
Harrogate |
Area 6 Greenhow Hill Landslips ( Duck Street) |
19/20 |
Revised Contractor Programme |
53,767 |
yes |
Harrogate |
TSBA, Kings Rd/ Bilton |
13/14 |
Agreement of design |
150,000 |
|
Harrogate |
Area 6 B1224 Wetherby Services Roundabout Resurfacing |
20/21 |
Design re be confirmed/ multiple stakeholders involved |
200,000 |
|
Harrogate |
Area 6 Leeds Road R&R A6 Urban Tender 20/21 |
20/21 |
Tender over year end |
866,897 |
yes |
Harrogate |
Area 6 Timble R&R A6 Rural Tender 20/21 |
20/21 |
Tender over year end |
382,766 |
yes |
Hambleton |
Area 2 Northallerton High Street Drainage |
20/21 |
Coordination with District Council works |
36,000 |
yes |
Hambleton |
Area 2 West Tanfield Drainage |
20/21 |
Design issues pushed it last quarter, then weather delays |
34,500 |
|
Hambleton |
Howe Bridge |
20/21 |
Waiting on CECF EA permit said 15thJune 2021. |
148,559 |
yes |
Countywide |
Traffic Signals Block Allocation |
20/21 |
Issues with delivery of equipment |
168,466 |
yes |
Countywide |
Road Footbridges |
20/21 |
Issues with delivery of equipment |
6,853 |
yes |
Schemes to be moved from 2020/21 to 2021/22
Initial equality impact assessment screening form (As of October
2015 this form replaces ‘Record of decision not to carry out
an EIA
This form records an equality screening process to determine the relevance of equality to a proposal, and a decision whether or not a full EIA would be appropriate or proportionate. |
|||||||
Directorate |
Business and Environmental Services
|
||||||
Service area |
Highways & Transportation
|
||||||
Proposal being screened |
Highways Capital Programme 2021/22 - Approval of schemes not included at previous BES Executive Members meeting.
|
||||||
Officer(s) carrying out screening |
Kirstine Rudd
|
||||||
What are you proposing to do? |
Agree additions to the capital programme in advance of the next scheduled capital programme BES Executive Member report.
|
||||||
Why are you proposing this? What are the desired outcomes? |
Minimise the duration between scheme identification and agreement for inclusion on the agreed capital programme. |
||||||
Does the proposal involve a significant commitment or removal of resources? Please give details. |
No, the proposal will result in reprioritisation of the current allocations to enable three additional schemes to be delivered.
|
||||||
Impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYCC’s additional agreed characteristic As part of this assessment, please consider the following questions: · To what extent is this service used by particular groups of people with protected characteristics? · Does the proposal relate to functions that previous consultation has identified as important? · Do different groups have different needs or experiences in the area the proposal relates to?
If for any characteristic it is considered that there is likely to be a significant adverse impact or you have ticked ‘Don’t know/no info available’, then a full EIA should be carried out where this is proportionate. You are advised to speak to your Equality rep for advice if you are in any doubt.
|
|||||||
Protected characteristic |
Yes |
No |
Don’t know/No info available |
||||
Age |
|
ü |
|
||||
Disability |
|
ü |
|
||||
Sex (Gender) |
|
ü |
|
||||
Race |
|
ü |
|
||||
Sexual orientation |
|
ü |
|
||||
Gender reassignment |
|
ü |
|
||||
Religion or belief |
|
ü |
|
||||
Pregnancy or maternity |
|
ü |
|
||||
Marriage or civil partnership |
|
ü |
|
||||
NYCC additional characteristic |
|||||||
People in rural areas |
|
ü |
|
||||
People on a low income |
|
ü |
|
||||
Carer (unpaid family or friend) |
|
ü |
|
||||
Does the proposal relate to an area where there are known inequalities/probable impacts (e.g. disabled people’s access to public transport)? Please give details. |
No, the proposals do not negatively affect any groups of people.
|
||||||
Will the proposal have a significant effect on how other organisations operate? (e.g. partners, funding criteria, etc.). Do any of these organisations support people with protected characteristics? Please explain why you have reached this conclusion. |
No, the proposal will have no effect on how other organisations work.
|
||||||
Decision (Please tick one option) |
EIA not relevant or proportionate: |
ü |
Continue to full EIA: |
|
|||
Reason for decision |
The allocation of funding is based on the ‘manage, maintain and improve’ (MMI) hierarchy set out in LTP4 which has been the subject of a full EIA. This concluded that the introduction of fewer improvement schemes may have a greater impact on people with mobility difficulties or without access to private vehicles as there will be fewer new facilities provided e.g. pedestrian crossings, dropped kerbs, bus stop accessibility improvements; however, it is also considered that prioritising maintenance, particularly for footways, through the MMI hierarchy is likely to produce a net benefit for people with the same protected characteristics; particularly in terms of age and disability.
|
||||||
Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent) |
Barrie Mason
|
||||||
Date |
11/05/21
|
||||||
Climate change
impact
assessment
The purpose of this assessment is to help us understand the likely impacts of our decisions on the environment of North Yorkshire and on our aspiration to achieve net carbon neutrality by 2030, or as close to that date as possible. The intention is to mitigate negative effects and identify projects which will have positive effects.
This document should be completed in consultation with the supporting guidance. The final document will be published as part of the decision making process and should be written in Plain English.
If you have any additional queries which are not covered by the guidance please email climatechange@northyorks.gov.uk
![]() |
Title of proposal |
Highways Capital Programme 2020/21 – October 2020/21 Update |
Brief description of proposal |
1.3 To seek agreement from the Corporate Director, Business and Environmental Services (BES), in consultation with BES Executive Members, for additions to the Highways Capital Works Programme for Structural Highway Maintenance for 2021/22 identified since the last Highways Capital Programme report dated 21st August 2020
|
Directorate |
BES |
Service area |
Highways and Transportation |
Lead officer |
James Gilroy |
Names and roles of other people involved in carrying out the impact assessment |
|
Date impact assessment started |
09.10.2020 |
Options appraisal Were any other options considered in trying to achieve the aim of this project? If so, please give brief details and explain why alternative options were not progressed.
No other options were progressed for adding schemes to the capital programme, as not carrying out the scheme in Appendix 1 would create a safety risk for highway users.
|
What impact will this proposal have on council budgets? Will it be cost neutral, have increased cost or reduce costs?
Please explain briefly why this will be the result, detailing estimated savings or costs where this is possible.
Any additional costs associated with implementation of the scheme/s named in Appendix 1 will be accounted for as part of the routine strategic management of the Highways Capital Works Programme.
The contents of this report make no changes to the BES Capital Plan expenditure limits
|
How will this proposal impact on the environment?
|
Positive impact (Place a X in the box below where relevant) |
No impact (Place a X in the box below where relevant) |
Negative impact (Place a X in the box below where relevant) |
Explain why will it have this effect and over what timescale?
Where possible/relevant please include: · Changes over and above business as usual · Evidence or measurement of effect · Figures for CO2e · Links to relevant documents |
Explain how you plan to mitigate any negative impacts.
|
Explain how you plan to improve any positive outcomes as far as possible. |
|
Minimise greenhouse gas emissions e.g. reducing emissions from travel, increasing energy efficiencies etc.
|
Emissions from travel |
|
x |
|
Repairs to existing infrastructure |
|
|
Emissions from construction |
|
|
x |
Some emissions from construction vehicles |
Where possible – ensure that vehicle mileage is reduced by planning vehicle movements / diversion routes etc |
|
|
Emissions from running of buildings |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise waste: Reduce, reuse, recycle and compost e.g. reducing use of single use plastic |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce water consumption |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise pollution (including air, land, water, light and noise)
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Ensure resilience to the effects of climate change e.g. reducing flood risk, mitigating effects of drier, hotter summers |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Enhance conservation and wildlife
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Safeguard the distinctive characteristics, features and special qualities of North Yorkshire’s landscape
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (please state below)
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
Are there any recognised good practice environmental standards in relation to this proposal? If so, please detail how this proposal meets those standards. |
N/A
|
Summary Summarise the findings of your impact assessment, including impacts, the recommendation in relation to addressing impacts, including any legal advice, and next steps. This summary should be used as part of the report to the decision maker.
Minimal negative impact of the added scheme. Helps to ensure safety for all road users & repairs an existing highway asset. Steps will be taken to ensure that construction emissions are reduced as far as possible.
|
Sign off section
This climate change impact assessment was completed by:
Authorised by relevant Assistant Director (signature): Barrie Mason
Date: 11/05/21
|