North Yorkshire County Council

 

Business and Environmental Services

 

Executive Members

 

21 May 2021

 

Highways Capital Programme 2021-22

 

Report of the Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation

 

1.0          Purpose of Report

 

1.1         To seek agreement from the Corporate Director - Business and Environmental Services (BES), in consultation with BES Executive Members, for additions to the Highways Capital Works Programme for Structural Highway Maintenance for 2021/22 identified since the last Highways Capital Programme report dated 21 August 2020

 

1.2         To update Corporate Director – BES and BES Executive Members on schemes that have been moved from the 2020/21 Highways Capital programme in to the 2021/22 programme.

 

 

2.0       Background

 

2.1       The Highways Capital Programme is made up of four specific elements; these are Street Lighting; Bridges and Structures; Integrated Transport and Structural Highway Maintenance.  Each of these elements is subject to prioritisation methods based upon an assessment of the required outcomes.

 

2.2       BES Executive Members will be aware that usual practice is to present two main reports per year; one in the summer, when the following years schemes are reported; followed by a winter report, when necessary changes to the programme are reported along with the headline allocations for the programme for the year after.

 

2.3       In line with 2.2 above, the report was considered at the BES Executive Members meeting held on 21 August 2020.

 

2.4         Although advanced planning is maximised through the implementation of a three-year rolling capital works programme, there are occasions when it is necessary, for sound operational reasons, to introduce new schemes into the in-year programme.

 

2.5         In a similar way it is sometimes not possible to deliver programmed schemes in the financial year initially intended, these schemes are then re-programmed into later years when implementation of works can take place.

 

3.0       New Schemes to be introduced in the 2021/22 Capital Works Programme

 

3.1         The following schemes are proposed to be added to the 2021/22 programme, in advance of the next scheduled Highways Capital Programme report:

·               Ridge Lane Landslip

·               Borrowby Lane Landslip

·               Beckhole Landslip

 

3.2         Further details can be found in Appendix 1.

 

4.0         Schemes to be carried forward into later years

 

4.1         During Q4 an additional 64 schemes were moved from 2020/21 to 2021/22.   This means that in total 150 schemes to the value of £13.8M have been moved into 2021/22 from initial delivery in 2020/21.  Funding for these schemes will be from the £5.3M of 2020/21 LTP funding carried into 2021/22 alongside the 2021/22 Highways capital budget.

 

4.2         Details of the recent schemes to be moved can be found in Appendix 2.

 

4.3         Of the 150 schemes carried into 2021/22, 51 of these are schemes that had started on site in 2020/21 and are due to finish in 2021/22.  This accounts for £5,366K of the total carry over value.

 

5.0         Financial Implications

 

5.1         Any additional costs associated with implementation of the scheme/s named in Appendix 1 will be accounted for as part of the routine strategic management of the Highways Capital Works Programme. 

 

5.2         As stated above £5.3M of 2020/21 LTP funding was carried forward at financial year end into 2021/22.  This funding will deliver some of the schemes carried over from 2021/22 with the rest of these schemes to be funded from 2021/22 LTP funding.

 

5.3         The contents of this report make no changes to the BES Capital Plan expenditure limits.

 

6.0       Equalities Implications

 

6.1       An Equality Impact Assessment screening form was included as part of the Capital Programme overall and this found that an Equality Impact Assessment was not required.  As these schemes are typical maintenance schemes it is deemed that the original screening form included schemes of this type and that there will be no Equality Implications arising from this recommendation.  See Appendix 3.

 

7.0       Legal Implications

 

7.1       The County Council, as Local Highway Authority, Street Authority and Traffic Authority has a wide range of statutory duties imposed by a variety of legislation.

 

7.2       Although the decision to carry out these schemes has been made in-year, it was developed and prioritised in line with the relevant legislation and approved Council policies.

 

7.3       It is the view of officers that there are no legal implications in terms of adding these schemes to the capital programme. 

 

8.0       Climate Change Impact

 

8.1       A climate change impact assessment has been carried out, see Appendix 4.  The negative impact of the schemes added to the capital programme is minimal. Steps will be taken during construction to reduce constriction emissions as far as possible.

 

 

9.0       Recommendation

 

9.1       It is recommended that the Corporate Director - BES and the BES Executive Members

i.           Agree the additional schemes for delivery in the 2021/22 financial year.

ii.          Note the schemes that have been moved in to 2021/22 for delivery.

 

 

 

 

BARRIE MASON

Assistant Director - Highways and Transportation

 

 

Author of Report: Kirstine Rudd

 

 

Background Documents:  Photographs to be presented at meeting


 

Schemes to be added to the Capital Programme

 

District

 

Location

Address

Est Cost/£

Reason for addition

Scarborough

 

Ridge Lane

U2269

£103,500

Landslip caused by recent bad weather has resulted in significant damage to the carriageway.  The road is currently closed

Scarborough

 

Borrowby Lane

U2275

£34,000

Landslip caused by recent bad weather has resulted in significant damage to the carriageway.  The road is currently closed

Scarborough

 

Beckhole   

Beck Hole Road, Goathland

£75,000

Following the cold weather at the beginning of this year there has been slippage of the road surface.  The proposal is to install further drainage to the site and then reinstate the carriageway that has slipped.

 

 


Schemes Slipped from Quarter 4 2020/21 in to future years.

 

District

Scheme Description

Original Programme Year

Reason

Amount to Carry over

Part delivered over year end

Selby

Area 7 Junction 34 R&R

20/21

Scheme carried over waiting for authority from Highways England

      139,000

 

Selby

Accessibility Various locations, Thorpe Willoughby

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        10,526

 yes

Scarborough

Area 3 Cat 3,4,5, Parkfield Footway

18/19

Staffing Issues

        15,000

 

Scarborough

Bagdale Railings

20/21

Staffing Issues

        27,925

 yes

Scarborough

Area 3 Killerby Bends

19/20

Revised Contractor Programme

          4,000

 

Scarborough

Area 3 East Ayton Landslips 

19/20

Design issues

      130,000

 

Scarborough

Area 3  Cat 4b Carriageway Patching  Oak Road

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        76,431

 

Scarborough

Area 3  Cat 4b Carriageway Patching  Highfield

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

      120,000

 

Scarborough

Area 3 Scalby Drainage

20/21

Coordination with District Council

        39,520

 

Scarborough

Area 3 Seamer Drainage , Rattan Row

20/21

Issues with Farming Crop and then poor weather in Q4

        12,378

 yes

Scarborough

Area 3 Staithes Landslip

20/21

WSP   redesign still to be agreed

        18,568

 yes

Scarborough

Fryup Dale Bridge

20/21

Requires good weather

        10,250

 

Scarborough

B1261 Crossgates Roundabout Drainage

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

          5,966

 

Scarborough

Westside Road, Darncombe Flooding

20/21

Requires good weather

        12,000

 

Scarborough

The Delves

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        30,000

 

Scarborough

Broxa,  Hackness

20/21

Tender over year end

      206,484

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Rosedale Church House Landslips 

19/20

Weather and farm access

          1,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Thornton le Clay R&R 

19/20

Revised Contractor Programme

        24,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4   Cat 1,1a,2  Footway Patching

20/21

Malton tender coordination

          9,620

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4  Cat 3b Carriageway Patching

20/21

River flood causes issues with completing scheme

        10,000

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Aislaby R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

      104,000

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Cropton

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        12,500

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Hawnby R&R

20/21

Tender over year end

          6,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Old Byland R&R

20/21

Tender over year end

          7,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Rosedale  R&R

20/21

Tender over year end

          5,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Hutton le Hole R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        38,268

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Kirby Grindalthye R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        38,279

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Kirkham Lane R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        64,000

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Langley Drvie Drainage

20/21

Works to be completed in better weather

          2,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Lastingham R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        83,861

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Malton Footway R&R 

20/21

Coordination with  term time

        38,874

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Malton R&R

20/21

Network Rail Coordination

        49,787

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Pickering R&R

20/21

Network Rail Coordination

        10,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Wombleton R&R

20/21

Network Rail Coordination

          9,000

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Nunnington R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        99,180

 

Ryedale

Area 4 Terrington R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        85,170

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Whitwell R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        74,773

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Wilton R&R

20/21

Revised Contractor Programme

        65,504

 

Ryedale

Area 4 York Road Levisham Drainage

20/21

Common land issue still to be resolved

          7,912

 

Ryedale

Area 4 CAULKLEYS R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

        50,898

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Balksyde

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

        15,552

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 Ampleforth R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

        78,076

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 GILLING EAST R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

        95,676

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 MARTON R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

      141,185

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 NUNNINGTON R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

        73,155

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 SPROXTON R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

      294,473

 yes

Ryedale

Area 4 WEST FIELDS KMS R&R

21/22

Tender package delivered over year end

        31,190

 yes

Richmondshire

Streetlighting

20/21

Service connections not done on time

      200,000

 yes

Richmondshire

Area 1 Worton Layby R&R

20/21

Contractor delays after awarding tender

                 -  

 

Richmondshire

Area 1 Worton R&R

20/21

Contractor delays after awarding tender

      308,600

 

Richmondshire

Area 1 Worton Village R&R

20/21

Contractor delays after awarding tender

                 -  

 

Richmondshire

Area 1 Swaledale Emergency Landslips

20/21

Further work requiring better weather

        27,272

 yes

Harrogate

Area 6 Greenhow Hill Landslips   ( Duck Street)

19/20

Revised Contractor Programme

        53,767

 yes

Harrogate

TSBA,  Kings Rd/ Bilton

13/14

Agreement of  design

      150,000

 

Harrogate

Area 6 B1224 Wetherby Services Roundabout Resurfacing

20/21

Design re be confirmed/ multiple stakeholders involved

      200,000

 

Harrogate

Area 6 Leeds Road  R&R  A6 Urban Tender 20/21

20/21

Tender over year end

      866,897

 yes

Harrogate

Area 6 Timble R&R  A6 Rural Tender 20/21

20/21

Tender over year end

      382,766

 yes

Hambleton

Area 2 Northallerton High Street Drainage

20/21

Coordination with District Council works

        36,000

 yes

Hambleton

Area 2 West Tanfield Drainage

20/21

Design issues pushed it last quarter, then weather delays

        34,500

 

Hambleton

Howe  Bridge

20/21

Waiting on CECF EA permit said 15thJune 2021.

      148,559

 yes

Countywide

Traffic Signals Block Allocation

20/21

Issues with delivery of equipment

      168,466

 yes

Countywide

Road Footbridges

20/21

Issues with delivery of equipment

          6,853

 yes

 

 

 

 


Schemes to be moved from 2020/21 to 2021/22

 

Initial equality impact assessment screening form

(As of October 2015 this form replaces ‘Record of decision not to carry out an EIA)

 

This form records an equality screening process to determine the relevance of equality to a proposal, and a decision whether or not a full EIA would be appropriate or proportionate.

Directorate

Business and Environmental Services

 

Service area

Highways & Transportation

 

Proposal being screened

Highways Capital Programme 2021/22 - Approval of schemes not included at previous BES Executive Members meeting.

 

Officer(s) carrying out screening

Kirstine Rudd

 

What are you proposing to do?

Agree additions to the capital programme in advance of the next scheduled capital programme BES Executive Member report.

 

Why are you proposing this? What are the desired outcomes?

Minimise the duration between scheme identification and agreement for inclusion on the agreed capital programme. 

Does the proposal involve a significant commitment or removal of resources? Please give details.

No, the proposal will result in reprioritisation of the current allocations to enable three additional schemes to be delivered.

 

Impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYCC’s additional agreed characteristic

As part of this assessment, please consider the following questions:

·       To what extent is this service used by particular groups of people with protected characteristics?

·       Does the proposal relate to functions that previous consultation has identified as important?

·       Do different groups have different needs or experiences in the area the proposal relates to?

 

If for any characteristic it is considered that there is likely to be a significant adverse impact or you have ticked ‘Don’t know/no info available’, then a full EIA should be carried out where this is proportionate. You are advised to speak to your Equality rep for advice if you are in any doubt.

 

Protected characteristic

Yes

No

Don’t know/No info available

Age

 

ü

 

Disability

 

ü

 

Sex (Gender)

 

ü

 

Race

 

ü

 

Sexual orientation

 

ü

 

Gender reassignment

 

ü

 

Religion or belief

 

ü

 

Pregnancy or maternity

 

ü

 

Marriage or civil partnership

 

ü

 

NYCC additional characteristic

People in rural areas

 

ü

 

People on a low income

 

ü

 

Carer (unpaid family or friend)

 

ü

 

Does the proposal relate to an area where there are known inequalities/probable impacts (e.g. disabled people’s access to public transport)? Please give details.

No, the proposals do not negatively affect any groups of people.

 

 

 

Will the proposal have a significant effect on how other organisations operate? (e.g. partners, funding criteria, etc.). Do any of these organisations support people with protected characteristics? Please explain why you have reached this conclusion.

No, the proposal will have no effect on how other organisations work.

 

Decision (Please tick one option)

EIA not relevant or proportionate:

ü

Continue to full EIA:

 

Reason for decision

The allocation of funding is based on the ‘manage, maintain and improve’ (MMI) hierarchy set out in LTP4 which has been the subject of a full EIA. This concluded that the introduction of fewer improvement schemes may have a greater impact on people with mobility difficulties or without access to private vehicles as there will be fewer new facilities provided e.g. pedestrian crossings, dropped kerbs, bus stop accessibility improvements; however, it is also considered that prioritising maintenance, particularly for footways, through the MMI hierarchy is likely to produce a net benefit for people with the same protected characteristics; particularly in terms of age and disability.

 

Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent)

Barrie Mason

 

Date

11/05/21

 

 

 

 


Climate change impact assessment                                                                                                                                                                                                          

 

The purpose of this assessment is to help us understand the likely impacts of our decisions on the environment of North Yorkshire and on our aspiration to achieve net carbon neutrality by 2030, or as close to that date as possible. The intention is to mitigate negative effects and identify projects which will have positive effects.

 

This document should be completed in consultation with the supporting guidance. The final document will be published as part of the decision making process and should be written in Plain English.

 

If you have any additional queries which are not covered by the guidance please email climatechange@northyorks.gov.uk 

Please note: You may not need to undertake this assessment if your proposal will be subject to any of the following: 
 Planning Permission
 Environmental Impact Assessment
 Strategic Environmental Assessment
 
 However, you will still need to summarise your findings in in the summary section of the form below.
 
 Please contact climatechange@northyorks.gov.uk for advice.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Title of proposal

Highways Capital Programme 2020/21 – October 2020/21 Update

Brief description of proposal

1.3         To seek agreement from the Corporate Director, Business and Environmental Services (BES), in consultation with BES Executive Members, for additions to the Highways Capital Works Programme for Structural Highway Maintenance for 2021/22 identified since the last Highways Capital Programme report dated 21st August 2020

 

Directorate

BES

Service area

Highways and Transportation

Lead officer

James Gilroy

Names and roles of other people involved in carrying out the impact assessment

 

Date impact assessment started

09.10.2020

 

 

Options appraisal

Were any other options considered in trying to achieve the aim of this project? If so, please give brief details and explain why alternative options were not progressed.

 

No other options were progressed for adding schemes to the capital programme, as not carrying out the scheme in Appendix 1 would create a safety risk for highway users.

 

What impact will this proposal have on council budgets? Will it be cost neutral, have increased cost or reduce costs?

 

Please explain briefly why this will be the result, detailing estimated savings or costs where this is possible.

 

Any additional costs associated with implementation of the scheme/s named in Appendix 1 will be accounted for as part of the routine strategic management of the Highways Capital Works Programme.

 

The contents of this report make no changes to the BES Capital Plan expenditure limits

 

 

 

 

 

How will this proposal impact on the environment?


N.B. There may be short term negative impact and longer term positive impact. Please include all potential impacts over the lifetime of a project and provide an explanation.

Positive impact

(Place a X in the box below where relevant)

No impact

(Place a X in the box below where relevant)

Negative impact

(Place a X in the box below where relevant)

Explain why will it have this effect and over what timescale?

 

Where possible/relevant please include:

·      Changes over and above business as usual

·      Evidence or measurement of effect

·      Figures for CO2e

·      Links to relevant documents

Explain how you plan to mitigate any negative impacts.

 

Explain how you plan to improve any positive outcomes as far as possible.

Minimise greenhouse gas emissions e.g. reducing emissions from travel, increasing energy efficiencies etc.

 

Emissions from travel

 

x

 

Repairs to existing infrastructure

 

 

Emissions from construction

 

 

x

Some emissions from construction vehicles

Where possible – ensure that vehicle mileage is reduced by planning vehicle movements / diversion routes etc

 

Emissions from running of buildings

 

x

 

 

 

 

Other

 

x

 

 

 

 

Minimise waste: Reduce, reuse, recycle and compost e.g. reducing use of single use plastic

 

x

 

 

 

 

Reduce water consumption

 

x

 

 

 

 

Minimise pollution (including air, land, water, light and noise)

 

 

x

 

 

 

 

Ensure resilience to the effects of climate change e.g. reducing flood risk, mitigating effects of drier, hotter summers

 

x

 

 

 

 

Enhance conservation and wildlife

 

 

x

 

 

 

 

Safeguard the distinctive characteristics, features and special qualities of North Yorkshire’s landscape

 

 

x

 

 

 

 

 

Other (please state below)

 

 

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are there any recognised good practice environmental standards in relation to this proposal? If so, please detail how this proposal meets those standards.

 

N/A

 

 

 

Summary Summarise the findings of your impact assessment, including impacts, the recommendation in relation to addressing impacts, including any legal advice, and next steps. This summary should be used as part of the report to the decision maker.

 

Minimal negative impact of the added scheme.  Helps to ensure safety for all road users & repairs an existing highway asset.  Steps will be taken to ensure that construction emissions are reduced as far as possible.

 

 

 

Sign off section

 

This climate change impact assessment was completed by:

 

Name

James Gilroy

Job title

Team Leader Highway Asset Management

Service area

Highways and Transport

Directorate

BES

Signature

J Gilroy

Completion date

07/05/2021

 

Authorised by relevant Assistant Director (signature): Barrie Mason

 

Date: 11/05/21